Activity Reviews
Review completed activities, capture inspection outcomes and maintain submission history.
QA/QC
A percentage update alone does not tell management whether completed work meets the acceptance criteria. CPCS connects physical completion to authorised review, inspection, correction and evidence.
Current CPCS QA/QC workspace
The QA/QC overview brings activity reviews, inspections, NCRs, snags, ITPs, checklists and Quality Records into one project-quality view.
The quality workflow
Work reaches the agreed physical completion point.
Authorised QA/QC reviewers approve, reject or require correction and resubmission.
Inspections, ITPs and Checklists provide structured acceptance evidence.
NCRs, snags and Quality Records preserve the correction and close-out trail.
Current V1.1 scope
Review completed activities, capture inspection outcomes and maintain submission history.
Raise and maintain inspection records with project references, outcomes and comments.
Track non-conformance, ownership, root cause, corrective action and verification.
Maintain defect lists, priorities, owners, due dates and verification status.
Define stages, tests, acceptance criteria, responsible parties and Hold / Witness / Review / Surveillance points.
Use repeatable line items with Pending, Pass, Fail and N/A responses tied to inspections or ITPs.
Build a traceable project quality dossier linked back to inspections, NCRs, snags, ITPs, checklists, activities and documents.
Review pending, rejected and outstanding quality workload before accepting project completion or close-out.
ITPs & Checklists
ITPs let teams set the required inspection and test sequence. Checklists turn those criteria into repeatable item-by-item verification, while failed items can be routed into the appropriate corrective workflow.
See the CPCS quality workflow from Activity Review through ITP, Checklist, NCR and Quality Record.